| |
July 2002 Volume 4, Number 3 Status of the ASCE/USEPA National Stormwater BMP Database
Jonathan Jones, P.E., Eric Strecker, P.E. and Ben Urbonas, P.E.
The ASCE/USEPA National Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMP)
Database contains 198 BMPs as of the June 2002. This represents substantial growth
of the standardized BMP information contained in the database since the initial 71-
BMPs were released to the stormwater management community in June 1999. The
Urban Water Resources Research Council of EWRI/ASCE, under a cooperative
agreement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), continues to focus
on compilation and entry of high quality BMP data into the national database. The
significantly expanded database can now be searched on-line or downloaded through
the project web site at http://www.bmpdatabase.org.
The concept of developing a national database arose in the mid-1990s out of the
realization that although there was a plethora of published information on BMP
performance, the studies did not follow standardized data collection, reporting and
performance evaluation protocols, making a scientific and consistent evaluation of
this data difficult. The need for BMP performance information is particularly critical
now since the EPA has mandated that most municipalities in the United States with
populations larger than 10,000 must obtain a stormwater runoff discharge permit by
2003. One of the key requirements of this permit program is implementation of non-structural
and structural best management practices (BMPs) appropriate to local
conditions. Communities need to know which types of BMPs are appropriate for them
(e.g., which BMPs function best in cold climates or in areas of heavy rainfall) and how
to monitor the performance of the BMPs they select to ensure they function properly.
The National Stormwater BMP Database and data analyses that are being enabled as
a result of this database will permit, in the long term, improvement of the BMP
selection and design process so that local stormwater management can be much more
effective than it is today.
Thus far, key project tasks have included: (1) collecting and evaluating existing
BMP design and performance data, (2) designing and creating the national BMP
database, (3) developing BMP performance evaluation protocols, and (4) evaluating
the data collected and reporting initial findings. A companion project to develop
stormwater BMP monitoring guidance was completed when it became apparent that
much of the available BMP data was of limited value due to inconsistent BMP
monitoring and reporting protocols used in the past, making evaluation of data and
transferability of findings difficult and often impossible. The monitoring guidance
manual provides practical and comprehensive guidance and is available through the
project web site.
The database can be used both to track BMP performance, as well as to research
performance of BMPs. Key categories of data requested in the database include (1)
test site location characteristics, (2) sponsoring and testing agencies, (3) watershed
characteristics, (4) BMP design parameters and cost data, (5) monitoring locations
and instrumentation, (6) monitoring costs, (7) precipitation data, (8) flow data, and
(9) water quality data. The types of structural BMPs currently accepted in the data
entry module are various types of detention basins, retention basins, infiltration
basins, wetland basins, wetland channels, biofilters/grass strips, filter media,
hydrodynamic devices, percolation trenches/dry wells, and porous pavement. Types of
nonstructural BMPs accepted in the data entry module include education, recycling,
maintenance practices and source controls. The requested data sets
were developed with peer review and input from an international
group of experts in the stormwater management field. Based on
data received to date, the greatest challenge is to ensure the
reporting of accurate precipitation, flow and water quality data. The
National Stormwater BMP Clearinghouse reviews new BMP data
sets prior to posting to the master database to ensure that required
data (e.g., design parameters, flows, water quality data) have been
provided and to ensure that the data are technically reasonable
(e.g., relationships between peak flows and flow volumes relative to
the tributary watershed and precipitation events are evaluated).
Table 1 summarizes the BMPs according to BMP types currently
in the database. Table 2 summarizes the types of BMPs in the
database by geographic distribution. Some of the preliminary
findings include:
- BMP performance should not be based on comparisons using
percent removal alone. It may be appropriate to use this measure
only on carefully chosen data subsets;
for example, sites that have similar
stormwater runoff water quality.
- The chosen performance evaluation
method can affect reported pollutant
removal efficiencies. For example,
some BMP types may have been
mischaracterized as less effective
because of cleaner influent. Most
BMPs and biochemical processes will
exhibit lower percent removals when
the concentrations are low in the
influent.
- Retention ponds and wetland basins are not well represented by individual storm-by-storm comparisons
because paired inflow and outflow data often are not from the
same event.
- Effluent quality is useful for characterizing the effectiveness of the
BMP; however, it is still important to determine if the BMP had
a statistically significant effect on water quality at each test site.
- Downstream geomorphic and biological responses and aquatic
habitat assessment may be better gauges of long-term BMP
effectiveness than pollutant removal efficiencies alone, but there
is insufficient information at this time to clearly suggest which
BMPs may best mitigate the effects of urbanization on receiving
waters.
- More BMP performance data are needed for sound statistical
analysis of their effectiveness and what design parameters most
influence their performance.
For more information, please contact the National Stormwater
| Table 1. Summary of National Stormwater BMP Database Sets |
| BMP Type |
Version 1.0 June 1999 |
New Studies as of June 2002 |
Totals as of June 2002 |
| Detention Basin |
7 |
17 |
24 |
| Media Filter |
5 |
25 |
30 |
| Grass Filter/Swale |
7 |
25 |
32 |
| Hydrodynamic Device |
2 |
14 |
16 |
| Infiltration Basin |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Non-structural (e.g., Street Cleaning, Maintenance) |
8 |
20 |
28 |
| Percolation Trench/Dry Well |
1 |
0 |
1 |
| Porous Pavement |
5 |
0 |
5 |
| Retention Pond |
21 |
12 |
33 |
| Wetland Basin |
7 |
8 |
15 |
| Wetland Channel |
8 |
6 |
14 |
| Total |
71 |
|
198 |
Table 2. Geographic Distribution of BMPs Posted to the Web Site as of June 2002. |
| State |
Number of BMPs |
State |
Number of BMPs |
| AL |
13 |
NJ |
3 |
| CA |
41 |
OH |
1 |
| CO |
4 |
ON, CAN |
1 |
| FL |
24 |
OR |
3 |
| GA |
2 |
TX |
19 |
| IL |
5 |
VA |
29 |
| MD |
4 |
WA |
20 |
| MI |
5 |
WI |
10 |
| MN |
7 |
Sweeden |
1 |
| NC |
6 |
Total |
198 |
BMP Databases Clearinghouse, (303-480-1700 or tlangan@wrightwater.com) or visit the project web site at
www.bmpdatabase.org. The Clearinghouse is available to help
facilitate electronic transfer of BMP data into the database and
welcomes submissions of BMP.
|
|